Obamacare And The Senior Swindle Scandal

Obamacare is in the news again and like so many previous stories, this one is scandalous, too.

The accusation, commonly called the Senior Swindle, is that to salvage votes from seniors, a large and reliable voting population, the Obama administration constructed a temporary payment program to funnel $8 billion to them between now and 2014. The payments hide the effects of Obamacare’s $200 billion in Medicare Advantage cuts. It’s the classic political game — pay them now, get their vote and stiff them later.

Now House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman, Darrell Issa, is squaring off with Health Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. The reason for Issa’s beef is the reluctance of the Department of Health and Human Services to supply his office with documentation requested months ago. This is eerily similar to Issa’s confrontation with Attorney General Eric Holder during the investigation of Fast and Furious. Holder refused to provide documentation and it lead to a contempt of Congress vote against him. Obama stepped in and used executive privilege to provide additional cover for his keystone cop.

As for the bonus program, the administration says all is well.

“The quality bonus payment demo is providing incentives to more (Medicare Advantage) plans to improve care, giving more patients high-quality choices in the program,” said a written response to Fox News. “It is consistent with previous demos.”

Except the Government Accountability Office doesn’t necessarily agree with that outlook. Earlier this year the GAO questioned the legal authority of the program. The shortcomings highlighted by the non-partisan watch-dog included a lack of a control group, paying “bonuses” to average performing plans and an excessive focus on 2012 payments. Go figure.

The Weekly Standard reported in July, “the GAO also previously observed that the demonstration “does not…conform to the principles of budget neutrality.” That’s a polite way of saying that the administration is running up the national debt by another $8.35 billion in order to boost Obama’s reelection prospects.”

Chairman Issa claims the bonus payments mask 71% of the Medicare Advantage cuts that took place this year as required by Obama-care. In a demand letter to Sebelius, the chairman stated she had until Thursday to provide the documentation or his committee will move to subpoena.

This legislation is a disaster. There is no other way to say it. Against the will of the people, rabid, over-zealous liberal-progressives made back-room deals and twisted-arms to get votes to make this happen. Even today, more than 60% of Americans are still against it.

Obamacare has hurt the economy because employers have decided not to expand or hire since few people know the true ramifications of the behemoth law. And how could they? It wasn’t even written when it was passed. And the select few that do know the details are politicians willing to lie to the citizens to cover for the law.

Most doctors and nurses are against it. Virtually all medical industry endorsements for Obamacare were manufactured by sweet-heart deals. The law is so expensive unions and businesses that are Democrat supporters demanded — and were given — exemptions.

As Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney point out, it robs Medicare of about $700 billion. It introduces some 20 new taxes which represents perhaps the largest tax increase ever. This hurts citizens and businesses.

We now know there will be a shortage of doctors, premiums are increasing, companies are dropping their existing plans and death panels, pardon me, bureaucrats rationing heath services to keep costs down were part of the original plan.

Obamacare is a horrifically profane law sold to Americans with blatant lies. It is bad for the country and was fashioned by perverted politicians that care more about themselves and their progressive-socialist political ideology than the well-being of the America.

Like it or not, with his ruling this summer, Chief Justice Roberts forever tied the fate of Obamacare with Barack Obama. In order to rid yourself, your family and your country of this nightmare law known as Obamacare, you must rid yourself and your country of this nightmare politician known as Barack Obama.

It is that simple.

Follow I.M. Citizen on Facebook or visit at IMCitizen.net

The Cain-Gingrich Debate Worthy of Your Attention: See the Transcript and Video

Bookmark and Share   Last night’s Lincoln-Douglas style debate between Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich was not exactly the Lincoln-Douglas of 7 score and thirteen years ago.  Moderators interjected themselves in to this debate a lot more than they did back then.  However the debate did offer a truly substantive discussion of the major issues confronting our nation.

In the end, even though Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich agreed on most issues, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich demonstrated a greater command of the issues than Herman Cain.  and was seemingly more confident in his own policy initiatives then was Cain in his policy positions and while Herman Cain discussed issues in broad, general terms, Newt Gingrich offered hard data to define and support his positions.  Cain even deferred to Gingrich on a few questions and allowed Newt to respond first.

But this debate proved both men worthy of consideration for President and their decision to enter in to a debate of such sheer substance warrants watching.  For that reason, White House 2012 suggests that you take the time to see it for yourself and invites you to do see by clicking on the image link below.  Below that image link is a partial transcript of the debate.

Partial transcript of the debate…..

The debate opens up with moderator, Iowa Congressman Steve King who thanks the debate organizers and proceeds lay out details about the national debt crisis.

GINGRICH:  If we are stupid enough to do nothing about the  debt, we will be bankrupt like Greece.  Paul Ryan would fundamentally  change Medicare by getting younger Americans into a premium support model — I do  not favor a mandatory premium support model.  I want us back into the habit  of giving Americans a range of choices so people have those choices in the free  market that would beat out the bureaucratic system. They need to go to something  because it is better for them not because the government forced them.   Americans are not going to let politicians impose things on them.

We have to come up with solutions that are actually  BETTER than what the government would force on you.  Look at WalMart,  people shop there because they think they will get a good deal.

We need to defeat so many entrenched elements of  the Left that we have to convince Americans that we represent a better future  than the Left does.

We have to get to a better health system before we  get to an affordable health system.

Look at STOP PAYING THE CROOKS and read it.

Medicare pays between $70-120 billion a year to  crooks…like dentists who file 982 procedures a day.  The Super Committee is  not looking at this, because it requires thinking about Government…and getting  people in Washington to THINK is a very big challenge.

CAIN:  I am supposed to have a minute to  disagree with Gingrich, but I don’t.  So I would like to instead to add a  historical perspective, since Gingrich and I can change the rules as we  go.  I remember talking about Medicare when I first went to Godfather’s  pizza.  Things inside the company were easier to control outside.   Medicare started in 1965 and our government told us it would cost $6 billion to  rollout, and we were told that by 1990 it would cost $12 billion.  But in  1990, it actually cost $109 billion. IT WAS A 900% MISS.

How many businesses can survive missing a target  like this.

Long term government projections about cost have  never been right.  NAME ONE.

That being said, I believe as Speaker Gingrich  believes that we can’t reshuffle Medicare or Medicaid, we must  RESTRUCTURE.  A guiding principle in the Ryan Plan that I love is that if  you want to solve a problem, you must go to the source closest to the  problem.  It is not Washington DC…it is the states…it is the  patients.  Allowing Medicare accounts for younger workers is an option.

Another thing we have learned for decades is that  people spend other people’s money more recklessly than they spend their own  money.  Let it be their money and they will spend it better.  Get it  out of Washington DC.

Politicians have over promised for decades. We have  got to get real because we are headed off a cliff.

What to do about rising healthcare  costs…services, x-rays, etc…going up 17% regardless of the economy in a market  of their own.  Why does it occur and how do we deal with this?

CAIN:  We have the best healthcare in the  world.


We have a healthcare cost problem, you are  absolutely right.  In order to solve the healthcare cost problem, we must  use market driven patient centered approaches.  Talk to doctors.  Here  again, you cannot micromanage healthcare costs out of DC.  Every program we  have had out of DC has failed.  What we have to do is unravel the system  with market driven ideas.  HR3000 — introduced by Rep. Price in Georgia,  used to be HR3400 — open healthcare savings accounts, allow association health  plans.  At the Restaurant Association we wanted a plan to customize to our  workforce.  Under the current structure, we couldn’t do that.  Another  thing doctors would like is loser-pay laws at the state and federal level.   That’s what’s driving up malpractice insurance.  A loser pays law is a big  step in health reform.

GINGRICH:  I think that the mess of the health  system is an everything problem.  It is federal, state, doctor, patient  problem.  You can go back to 1943 wage price control decisions which was a  gimmick in WWII, but what happens in a third party payer system.  The person  receiving services isn’t paying so they don’t value it.  The person writing  the checks thinks the doctor is a crook.

Think about McDonalds.  You show up and ask  for a quarter pounder.  They give it to you.  You give them  money.  Everyone’s happen.  But if you pay them and you don’t get the  quarter pounder, there’s a problem.  This is not silly, it’s basic, and  this does not happen with healthcare.

We need to be in these non-30 second debates  because there is a lot of material that needs to be talked about…common sense  regardless of what the national establishment thinks is acceptable.  Cain  and I are the two most radical candidates in this because we are willing to talk  common sense, when most in Washington think that does not count.

I am the only Speaker in modern history to balance  the budget in 4 years.  We reformed an entitlement, we reformed Medicare  very carefully and had AARP neutral in a presidential election year.  If  you are serious about real health reform, you must abolish the Congressional  Budget Office because it lies.

Every hospital will tell you that if you get the  family and patient involved, it is better and less expensive.  The  Congressional Budget Office refuses to see this as a savings.  It wants  more bureaucracy and less patient involvement.

(Congressman King interrupts)

CAIN:  If you go back to Ryan’s plan, first of  all if you are 55 or older or you are already on Medicare you will not be  affected so don’t allow the Left to use scare tactics on you.  For the  younger workers, if they take that option of the Medicare account they will  treat it as their own money.

Initially it would be about $11,000 and you would  have to buy a Medicare approved plan.  When you treat it like it is your  money that is how you wean people off expecting that someone else will pay for  it and it will be someone else’s money.

GINGRICH:  I wrote a book in 2002 called  Saving Lives and Saving Money, and I outlined what to do.  Washington will  do three stupid things instead of one smart thing.

I just put on the table trillions of dollars that  would be saved by not paying crooks.  Why is it so hard to not penalize  good people before you stop paying crooks.  You can take existing IBM  technology and use it to stop paying crooks.

Why is it so hard to say you can turn this around  and pass a bill to contract out to American Express, VISA, and IBM to handle  Medicare payments and in 60 days you would save a TRILLION DOLLARS.

Anyone who currently prefers to go to a premium  support system should do it next year.  Tom Price has a great bill that  says if you want to contract out for healthcare let’s give you more  freedom.  Medicare is more restrictive than the British system.

GINGRICH — when you get the government  in the business of defining what you should have, the government will say you  don’t need this or that when you do.

Prostate Example — Medicare says not to test for  prostate cancer, when lives can be saved if detected quickly.  No one who  is a urologist or cancer specialist is making these decisions.  It is just  bureaucrats.  You need to move to a place where people get help buying  insurance but the family, the patient, and the doctors make the primary  decisions on keeping you healthy. Just imagine if there was government approval  on IPhones or computers…bureaucrats would stop innovation and would say that  1960 model is just fine for you.

CAIN:  I will make this brief.  In the  private sector for decades now they have been making the change from defined  benefits plans to define contributions plans.  It is your money.  And  so what the Ryan plan does with Medicare accounts is that they have individual  names on it with defined contributions where everyone will have an account and  own it and spend more responsibly.

GINGRICH:  I want to ask Cain what happened at  Godfather’s regarding the encroaching of government when CEOs are faced with the  out of control bureaucracy.

CAIN:  My advice to them is something I  realized when I first became CEO in 1986.  If I did not get involved in  these issues then the entire free market system would be collapsed.  Don’t  stand back and play it safe.  Get involved with the solution.  I want  to congratulate the Tea Party for putting these talks together and educating  people.  Better informed people will change this country.  You are all  becoming better involved. The Tea Party movement is real and growing.  The  Left is calling people racists to scare them away. My advice to CEOs and  business people is to get involved and not sit on the sidelines.  You can’t  stop it with expensive lobbyists down the road.

My question to Speaker Gingrich is that you spent a  lot of distinguished years in Congress and then you left Congress and started  other ventures and you were thinking outside the Washington bubble…what are  three things you realized outside that bubble.

GINGRICH:  As a business, you don’t  get to stay in business unless you wake up every day thinking about how to keep  customers.  If you don’t earn your pay in business, a business won’t pay  you.  We need to apply LEAN Sigma Six principles to government.

In every aspect of the private sector someone is  doing something brilliant that could be applied to government to reduce  costs…but the Left and the media block this.  If you found Best Practices  across the country, you would be amazed at how quickly you could balance the  budget and resolve the deficit.

When I left office as Speaker, there was a swing of  5 TRILLION dollars and we had a balanced budget.

CEOs set big goals with tight deadlines, delegate  smartly, and don’t let any so call experts in the room.

Social Security Reform….

CAIN:  Social Security….I am a firm believer  in solving problems.  Old ideas have prolonged the problem.  I am a  strong proponent of an idea that Bush introduced, these optional personal  retirement accounts.  30 countries have optional personal retirement  accounts.  Look at the Chilean model and I ask why can’t we do that?   We can do it if we fight the demagoguery and fight all those who don’t want the  current system to change.  We need to educate the public so they understand  this.

30 years ago, Chile had a social security system  like we do.  The workers got to 27% of every dollar earned going into this  and the system was broken.  When they gave people the option — within 3  years, 90% of people said we want the option because it became their money on an  account with their name on it and they don’t have the problems we have dealing  with social security.

If older Americans who have paid into the system,  they have a choice to continue on, or they can take the option of controlling it  yourself.  If you are close to retirement,your benefits will keep being  paid.  For younger people, they will have an option to control that benefit  yourself.  I have asked young workers if they would want to start investing  and controlling their own retirement…I have not found one person who would  rather keeping things as they are.  Investing conservatively will work  better than the current system.

CAIN — I am about fixing the  problems.  Payroll tax is the biggest tax that most people pay.  We  should be invited back to talk about the economy at another time.  We have  to change the tax code. It is one of the reason that healthcare costs keep going  up.  It makes no sense.  It promotes the idea that this is all someone  else’s money and not the employee’s.

The payroll tax would be eliminated in 9-9-9 we  would setup those optional accounts with that money that people could control  themselves.

GINGRICH:  I am going to sidestep the  opportunity to talk about 9-9-9.  Sean Hannity has asked us to spend an  hour in this format with him and I think we should do that.  Here in Texas,  there is the Galveston System where they discovered that if you put in about  half as much money in the private sector you would get twice as much as you  would giving it to government.

Any candidate who is not prepared to give younger  Americans the right to choose has not serious plan for social security.   Everyone who is currently on it, it won’t be touched, so don’t let the LEFT and  AARP lie to you.

First of all, with growth, you go back to where we  were when I left the Speakership, you can’t look at the current static model  from the CBO and see anything…it’s amazing what 10-15 extra million Americans  working does to social security.

Lyndon Johnson scored a cheap political point by  sucking social security into the budget to try to show a balanced budget.   Johnson began the problems of giving people the idea that they could steal this  money.  Senior citizens should not be scared like this.

Get social security out of the budget and make it a  freestanding retirement account again.

If you want to stay in the current system, and let  politicians like Barack Obama scare you that they are going to take your money  away from you, then you can stay in the system.

If you have your own personal social security  savings account and you want to retire early why would Congress tell you not  to…or if you were like Andy Rooney and stayed active until age 92, why should  Congress tell you that you can’t.  Let’s get back to allowing Americans to  control own lives.

CAIN: we as a nation are not short on good  ideas of how to fix social security.  What we are short on is the ability  to educate people on the solutions.  CEOs can help educate and inform their  workers on what is truth and what is garbage.  I believe the businesses in  America could provide a service of changing the paradigm of DC and inform the  employees on what is fact and what is not.

One of the big advantages in this election cycle is  the Tea Party, and the Internet. More people are smart and informed today.   The President needs to be a communicator in chief informing and educating  people, not scaring them.

GINGRICH:  Let’s talk about Herman’s role in  turning around Godfather’s pizza.  He came in and totally transformed that  business.  Let’s also talk about the Green Bay Packers and their  leadership.  I became a leader in Congress just like Herman did in business  because I was willing to tell the truth and talk directly to people.

The current president is as accurate and honest as  Bernie Madoff in what he tells the American people.

(Rep. King interrupts again)

GINGRICH:  It is a fraud and a lie the way  that Congress deals with social security.  The American people have put  money into a trust fund.  It is not hidden.  It is there.  But  every politician in Washington wants to find a gimmick to balance the budget off  the backs of working Americans.

If you take it off budget, you could solve social  security.  You take what’s in that fund, and you model it on what’s in  Chile, you find with a few modest cuts in spending you get to a stable  retirement program.

Since Johnson, we have been hiding the real size of  our budget deficit by obscuring it with social security.  We need to be  honest and separate these two things and deal with them.

CAIN:  This is what we have to be honest  about, it is going to take a long time to work ourselves out of this mess that  has been created for decades.  We can’t deal with unfunded liabilities, we  have to deal with a bill that says starting from now all social security  contributions will go towards social security benefits only.  What the  money is collected for, let’s put it towards that only.

(Rep. Steve King interrupts again)

GINGRICH: the private sector money in a personal  social security account goes into the private sector.  There will be a 1%  increase in economic growth just because of the amount of capital that would be  saved. In Chile they now have savings in their social security accounts that  equal 76% of their capital.  That is breathtaking and longterm and  stable.  We need to have separate money between social security and what  would be in the private savings account.

CAIN:  In the private sector, most companies  have moved to a defined contributions account.  The company will make a  contribution along with the employee.  The employee selects from several  options on how to invest.  You can declare yourself a low risk, a medium,  or a high risk investor.  You can do the same thing with personal  retirement accounts.  Parking the money is never the problem.  Yanking  it out of the federal budget is the problem.

Next topic:  Medicaid

CAIN:  I absolutely agree with block  granting to states.  IN order to solve the problem, the states know better  how to use their resources to provide the greatest amount of help to their  citizens.

Medicaid has gotten states hooked on it like  crack.  We have to break the crack habit with block grants.  The  states over time will have more flexibility.  We should not cut them off  cold turkey, but we need to start to end the dependency of states on Washington  bureaucracy.  We need to end the mandates to the states and let the states  decide.

GINGRICH:  Let’s look at Obamacare.  Go  to Newt.org for the proposed 21st Century Contract with America.  First  step is to repeal Obamacare.

I strongly support Paul Ryan’s approach to block  granting Medicaid.  Block grant all remaining welfare programs.  Give  the states the power to deal with the poor using innovation and money  savings.

We are going to have a real national debate on all  this.  I do not believe you solve problems under the Left’s policy of  people being helpless.  Read THE TRAGEDY OF AMERICAN COMPASSION.  We  need to rethink Medicaid much the way we rethought welfare reform.   Governor Bush in Florida had a program where people who took care of themselves  and didn’t go to the emergency room got a Christmas bonus.  To the shock of  academics, poor people were aware of money and strived to get that bonus by not  abusing the emergency rooms.  If you had the ability to triage and send  people to minute clinics, then the hospital wouldn’t charge emergency room  rates.  If you track someone who abuses the system there should be a  consequence for that.

We have to start distinguishing between the  taxpayer who is concerned with charitable care and taxpayers who are suckers and  are being exploited.

CAIN:  One of the principles I believe in is  going from an entitlement society to an empowerment society.  Help people  to help themselves.

No entitlement programs…teach people to fish, not  give them fish.

I would support a voucher system but not if a  voucher would pay all the costs.  People need skin in the game, otherwise  they will ask how much more the government will give them.

GINGRICH:  We need genuine block grants so  states can decide how best they should handle matters.  The whole purpose  of getting back to 50 states is to have 50 laboratories of experimentation since  Washington can’t fix things. We’ve seen this.

We need to think of all of these things being  integrated into one human being.

Public Housing — if we give people a place to live,  they need to help clean it, paint it, and fix it so they have skin in the  game.

The Left’s Model:  people are weak, helpless,  and stupid and need government to tell them what to do…but who does the Left  think the government hires to run the bureaucracy?

CAIN:  You need to block grant responsibility  as well as money.  You need the states to adhere to rules, and to have  responsibility for making decisions at the state level.  Right now they are  too caught up in bureaucracy.

GINGRICH:  I believe in health information  technology.  We need to have the same security and ease of information that  we have in using ATMs.  You can walk up to a machine in a foreign country,  you put in a code, and you can get money out in the local currency anywhere in  the world.  The center for Medicare and Medicaid uses only paper. It is 40  years behind the times. It stops us from getting into a better future.

CAIN:  We need to have standards and  not make it easy for people to cheat on things.  You can’t get on an  airplane without showing a valid ID.  Why should we allow people to do  other things without IDs. Photo IDs are needed and should be required to vote to  end fraud.  WHY NOT?

People who are fighting to require voter ID are  people who want cheating to continue in the voting process. There is much more  cheating going on than people want to admit.

GINGRICH:  There is a big gap in rational  thinking between the government and private sectors.  We have technology  that allows you to track a package with FedEx with remarkable accuracy.   One of my proposals is to send people a package to determine if they are here  illegally…(laughter)…but it’s funny but making a point about where we are.   We should be able to identify everyone who gets emergency aid and every state  should sue the federal government every year for every cent spent on illegals  who should not be in the United States.

That is the federal government’s  responsibility.


How to address the 72 entitlement  programs:

CAIN:  We need to change entitlement to  empowerment programs.  You need to prove you are looking for a job or are  taking classes to get a better job.  Means testing will help but you need  to make people take ownership and WANT to get off those programs.

I would block grant all entitlement programs back  to the states and give them the flexibility on how to modify the programs and  stretch those dollars.

GINGRICH:  You must start with the question on  whether or not means testing requires people to stay below.  We have the  most effective food stamp president in history right now and that is not a good  thing.

Do you want to rise above the point where you would  be means tested? You create a discouragement — read the book LOSING GROUND – you  are teaching people to be dependent and fail.  You need to rethink the idea  that people are getting something for nothing, because that’s not how it  works.  If someone is an able bodied person who is getting something for  nothing than we are stupid for giving it to you.

We need to fundamentally change unemployment  compensation.  We need to require training.  99 weeks of unemployment  sitting doing nothing could be turned into an associate’s degree.

I think that each state needs to have primary  responsibility for most of these domestic issues.

CAIN: Let me round this out.  We have talked  about the biggest elephant in the room, entitlement programs.  As you can  see, Speaker Gingrich and I are not afraid to talk about this.  The  government has been intellectually dishonest about these programs for 50  years.

Ultimately, all these programs work together and  what we come back to is that education and a job are the two best things that  get people off these programs.  We need to look at how to get people back  to work, want to get off it, and there will be a few people who are lazy and  they don’t want to help themselves….that’s their little boogiewoogie as my  grandmother used to say.

CAIN: I would restructure unemployment so that if  you got 26 weeks unemployment one time, then next time you would only get 13  weeks…then 7.5 weeks so that you are encouraged to get and keep a job.

GINGRICH:  I would connect the unemployed to  the jobs we can’t fill.  We have an older workforce who is not trained to  do the new jobs we can’t fill. From Day One, you need to get trained as fast as  possible to get a full time job because these people will need to do something  every single day in order to get a penny.

Cain and Gingrich ask each other a question now — not playing Gotcha! one time all night — Gingrich goes first:

GINGRICH:  You have had a terrific life.   We fought Hillarycare together years ago, what’s been the biggest surprise to  you in running for president?

CAIN: The nitpicketyness of the media.  I did  not realize the fly speaking nature of the media when you move up in the  polls….because if there is a journalistic standard, they don’t follow it, and  too many people give out misinformation. I thought that — and I did not study  political correctness in school — too many people in the media are dishonest and  do a disservice to the American people.

CAIN:  Mr. Speaker, if you were Vice President  of the United States (applause and laughter from crowd) what would you want me  to assign you to do first?


GINGRICH: Having studied Dick Cheney, I would not  go hunting.

Bookmark and Share

New DNC Attack Ad on Romney Demonstrates That You Can’t Have it Both Ways

   Bookmark and Share  In a continuing  demonstration of the fact that Obama Democrats are fearing Mitt Romney the most, the satellite Obama liberal campaign organization referred to as the Democratic National Committee, which is currently run by uber-liberal ass wipe, Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, has begun airing a new Ad entitled “Mitt Romney:  Absolutely Wrong for Women“.  The ad incorporates a Mississippi ballot measure in Tuesday’s election called the Personhood Amendment and Mittt Romney’s current position that claims life begins at conception.

The Personhood Amendment seeks to clarify Mississippi law in regards to defining when life begins.

The new DNC ad, takes clips of Romney confirming that he believes that life begins at conception and that he is opposited to abortion.

But the use of the ad raises significant questions about those who question Mitt Romney and wish to use his change of position on several issues over the last two decades.  While one line of attack that the White House and even Republican opponents hope to use against Romney is an image of flip flopping, a new line of attack seeks to attack Romney also for the same positions he has finally taken.

The problem is which is it that Romney’s opponents want us to believe?

Do they want us to believe that Romney continuously changes his positions and has no core?  Or do they want us to believe that he will remain committed to the positions he takes?  If they want to claim that Romney is a pathological flip-flopper, than why try to run against on the premis that he will  remain opposed to abortion?  If Mitt is a flip-flopper than should we take his committment seriously?

In the end, Democrats are going to have to pick one or the other.  Either Mitt Romney is not worthy of being President because he changes his mind or Mitt Romney is unfit to be President because he is committed to the belief that life begins at conception.  Arguing both undermines both arguments and essentially takes them off the table.

Bookmark and Share

Herman Cain Super PAC Fires Back the Way Herman Cain Needed To

Bookmark and Share  While the media tries wring out every last drop of negative innuendos and distortion out of the more than decade old, false sexual harassment charges against Americans for Herman Cain has out, calls the left wing establishment out for their characteristic “lynching” of African-Americans who disagree with the Democrat Party’s liberal agenda.

American’s for Herman Cain is not affiliated with Cain’s actual presidential campaign.  It is a super PAC, that can raise and spend any amount of moneyh it can in support of Herman Cain. The ad uses such notable hypocrites and socialists and communists as Hollywood’s Harry Belafonte, New York’s Al Sharpton, and liberal academia’s Professor Cornel West of Princeton University, or who I commonly refer to as Snagglepuss.  Each of them chastise Herman Cain.  West tells Herman Cain to get off the symbolic carackpipe, Belafoolte says Cain is denied intelligence, and in what ends up the most hysterical case of the pot calling the kettle black, Al “Tawana Brawley” Sharpton says that Cain is either “”socially ignorant, or playing games to get vote”.  Can you imaging that?  Al Sharpton accuses others of playing games to get votes.  That coming from a man who has taken part in conspiracies designed to inflame racial tension, inspire civil disobedience, and fuel class warfare, dares to blame another person, living or dead, of playing games to get votes.  That says it all folks.

But to punctuate the point Herman Cain is conveying, the ad utilizes the famous remarks from the man who is the best living example of liberal hypocrisy and injustice there is…….. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.   Cain’s ad closes with Thomas summing up the actions of the liberal media and the liberal senators who used Anita Hill’s false accusations of him as  a modern day form of a lynching of the black man who disagrees with them.

Up to now, Herman Cain has not helped himself in this sexual harassment matter.  He has was unprepared to respond to a story that he knew was coming out about these past accusations and when he did start responded to the story, he did so in a way that seemed to consistently contradict with each answer previously given by him, was slow to reveal those facts which he did know, quick to claim he forgot facts that he suddenly remembered, and in general did little to make people confident in his total innocence in the matter.  Cain had a chance to control this story before it came out.  Instead he allowed Politico, then the rest of the lamestream media to control the story and possibly Cain’s fate.   I have to say that I am disinclined to support Herman Cain now, based just on how he handled this episode.  And I believe that the accusation against Cain were false.

However, regardless of how Cain’s campaign mishandled this, this new web ad is should be a hint as to how he should handle this from now on.

But the credit for the spot most likely goes to Jordan Gerhke, the campaign manager for Americans for Herman Cain and a political consultant with expertise in the area of direct messaging.   I profiled Gerhke in a previous White House 2012 post that reproted the creation  of the Herman Cain for America’s “9-9-9 Fund”.

Gehrke’s ad should be an example  that someone over at Team Cainshould follow.  With Mark Blockhead running things, Cain seems to be atr a disadvantage and needs some of strategic intelligence.   If Cain only had the money and talent to turn this ad in to a thirty second spot and air it in the most effective media markets in New Hampshire, Iowa, South Carolina, and Florida.  If that were the case, he might be able to establish himself as a longterm frontrunner.

Bookmark and Share

%d bloggers like this: